 |
| Carriage House Window, Selby Gardens, Florida |
A sketch does not have to be complete to be finished.
For whatever reason, this statement has enchanted and intrigued me. It launched my curiosity into flight...so I decided to experiment.
In the sketches above, I did the one on the right first. It's a more finished sketch with some of the info (bricks) suggested. I then sketched the same view again on the left but more quickly. No pencil lines, just a brush and paint. I deliberate chose to leave the top and bottom of the sketch unfinished. I completely omitted any brick work or shadows in the window panes.
First Question: Which sketch appeals to you the most and can you tell me why?
When I look at the image on the left, I am more...engaged...with the view than I am with the one on the right. The left sketch has areas I can "finish" in my mind's eye because it isn't finished on the page. I don't find the loss of the bricks or the shadow shapes to be detrimental to what I was attempting to say with my sketch.
Second Question: How does one determine when a sketch is "complete" vs. "finished"?
I posted this over on Facebook to capture other artists' thoughts and ideas and someone suggested that leave a sketch unfinished had more to do with conveying a feeling than whether it's finished and went on to suggested that it may have more to do with when the artist felt the sketch was finished.
Third Question: Do you ever deliberately leave a sketch unfinished but feel it's complete?
This isn't a new concept by any means, but it is one I intend to explore and utilize more in my own work. In doing the two sketches above, I've already learned that it will take a deliberate and conscious effort on my part as my default is to "finish" the item/view/subject.
Fourth Question: Which do you like best, finished or unfinished sketches? Any particular reason why?
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this type of sketching!
